Cost vs Benchmark
+8.4%
Widening gap
Click for details ›
Payments Due (30 Days)
€745K
4 countries · 6 POs
Click for details ›
SCF Utilization
67%
€1.9M headroom remaining
Click for details ›
Suppliers at Risk
3 / 9
1 critical · 2 watch · 6 ok
Click for details ›
PO vs Market
2
1 overbuying · 1 opportunity
Click for details ›
Geo Concentration
68%
China · +27pts vs peers
Click for details ›
ESG Exposure
€2.4M
3 active regulations · 6 suppliers at risk
Click for details ›
CBAM Early Warning
€420K
Est. annual tariff · 5 China suppliers
Click for details ›
Non-FOB Cost Layer
€297K/qtr
+€77K above peer benchmark
Bars = yours · Green line = peer benchmark
Click for details ›
📡 Market & Competitor Intelligence
Commodity
−15%
Cotton at 82¢/lb — Sustained Decline
USDA Q2 confirms surplus. Your fixed contract unrecovered — €140K to date.
€140K
Review →
Freight
−8%
CN→EU Rates Stabilising at $2,200/40ft
Rates down 8% MoM. Your contract at €4.20 is 22% above L&F avg €3.45.
€95K opp
Explore →
Regulatory
Q1 2027
EU CSRD Scope 3 Mandatory — 6 Suppliers Non-Compliant
Upstream emissions data required. 9-month lead time recommended — start now.
6 suppl.
Assess →
FX
+3.7%
USD Weakening vs EUR — 38% of Contracts Exposed
Q2 favorable ~€95K. Q3+ risk rising without hedge. H2 exposure building.
€95K Q2
Hedge →
Peer · Urgent
−20%
Major EU buyer cutting China 20% — Vietnam & India accelerating
Q1 2026 earnings confirmed. 3-yr plan to reduce below 45%. You remain at 68%.
Geo risk
View Geo →
Peer · Watch
+8%
Bangladesh Minimum Wage +8% — Cost Pass-Through H2 2026
14 factories confirmed. 3–5% unit cost increase on BD-sourced categories H2.
BD cost
Cost →
Peer · Closing
+21%
2 Peers Secured Home Textile Q2–Q3 Capacity — You Remain Flat
Factory allocation windows closing in 30 days. Peers locked +18–25% PO uplift.
30 days
PO →
Peer · Accel
+25%
5 EU Peers Shifting 20–30% to Vietnam & Morocco Nearshore
Reporting 8–12% landed cost savings. CBAM pressure accelerating shift. You: 0%.
Nearshore
Roadmap →
Total Suppliers
9
L&F managed · active
Critical Risk
1
Jiangsu Xinhua Textiles
High Risk
2
Require monitoring
Total Annual Spend
€163M
Across 9 active suppliers
🌍 Global Supplier Map
Click a pin to view supplier profile
Low
High
Critical
Supplier Directory
Click supplier name to view full strategic profile · factory matrix · audit photos
| Supplier | Country | Annual Spend | Capacity | Risk | Certificates |
|---|
Supplier
Supplier Name
Country · Category
Categories Tracked
5
Q1 2026
Misaligned
2
Seasonal Deco + H.Text
Overstock Risk
€420K
Seasonal Deco
Missed Opportunity
€310K
Home Textile
📈 Demand Signals
PO vs market growth · L&F retail sell-through overlay
PO Change vs Market Growth (%)
Your PO % change vs market retail sales YoY · Q1 2026
Blue = Your PO · Green/Red = Market direction
Category Signals
Status · impact · recommended action
| Category | Your PO | Market | Signal | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seasonal Deco | ↑18% | ↓11% | Overbuying | €420K risk |
| Home Textile | Flat | ↑24% | Opportunity | €310K opp |
| Bedding | ↓3% | ↑8% | Watch | Monitor |
| Towels | ↑5% | ↑4% | Aligned | — |
| DIY Tools | ↑12% | ↑11% | Aligned | — |
⚠ Critical — Seasonal Deco
Buying into a structurally declining category for 3 consecutive quarters. Peer buyers reducing POs 8–15%. Inventory days up from 42 to 58. Each quarter of inaction compounds overstock risk.
🔒 L&F Cross-Buyer Signal
L&F retail sell-through confirms Seasonal Deco category-wide structural decline. Home Textile post-renovation surge has 2 more quarters of growth momentum. Factory capacity for H.Textile is filling — peers have already moved.
Overall Cost Gap
+8.4%
vs L&F benchmark
Recoverable
€340K
Renegotiation potential
Above-Benchmark
2 of 5
Bedding + S.Deco
Contract Renewal
Q4 2026
Key window for Bedding
💰 Cost & Pricing
Category cost vs L&F peer benchmark · contract analysis
Cost Gap vs Benchmark by Category
% above (+) or below (−) L&F market benchmark · Q1 2026
Benchmark Detail
Your unit cost vs L&F comparable buyer average
| Category | Yours | Mkt Avg | Gap | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bedding Linen | €3.47/unit | €3.20 | +8.4% | Renegotiate |
| Seasonal Deco | €4.12/unit | €3.97 | +3.8% | Monitor |
| Home Textile | €2.85/unit | €2.90 | -1.7% | Below mkt |
| Towels | €1.89/unit | €2.02 | -6.3% | Below mkt |
| DIY Tools | €5.21/unit | €5.46 | -4.6% | Below mkt |
💡 Commodity Update — Cotton
Cotlook A Index ↓15% since January 2026. Your Bedding Linen fixed contract has not adjusted. Unrecovered gap to date: €140K. Contract renews Sep 2026 — mid-term price clause review may allow reset before then.🔒 L&F Cross-Buyer Signal
Comparable L&F buyers pay €3.18–€3.24 for Bedding Linen — same spec and origin. Gap is contract-specific, not market-driven. Renegotiation window open now. Cotton input cost declined 8% — not passed through in current contracts.
Cotton Index
−15%
Sustained decline · buy opportunity
Linen/Flax Index
+22%
Sharp rise · floating contract risk
Polyester
+12%
Moderate rise · watch
Freight Rate
−8% MoM
$2,200/40ft · near stable
🚢 RM & Freight
Raw material indices + freight rate · L&F market data
Commodity Index — Oct 2025 to Mar 2026
Base 100 = Oct 2025 · Cotlook A (cotton) · Flax index (linen) · PTA (polyester)
Freight Rate Comparison
CN→EU 40ft container · Q1 2026
Your contract rate
€4.20/unit
L&F network avg
€3.45/unit
Gap: €0.75/unit · 22% above market
Est. annual saving via L&F consolidation: €95K
Supplier Exposure to Rising Linen
Floating contracts will pass through +22% linen price increase
| Supplier | Contract | Category | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu Xinhua | Floating | Bedding Linen | High |
| Shanghai Cotton | Floating | Home Textile | Medium |
| Guangdong Fabric | Fixed Q2 | Towels | Low |
🔒 L&F Cross-Buyer Signal
3 suppliers on floating linen contracts will pass through the +22% price increase in H2 PO negotiations. Cotton decline (-15%) not passed through — fixed contracts expiring Sep 2026. L&F consolidation program available for freight — peers on program paying €3.38/unit avg.
China Exposure
68%
Single-point risk — reduce to <50%
EU Revenue Share
48%
Largest market · P1 priority
APAC Risk Score
81/100
High risk · only 9% revenue
Diversification
18%
Non-China target: 40% by 2027
🌍 Geo Risk
Supply concentration vs revenue exposure · country risk trinity
Supplier Distribution by EUR Spend
% of total annual procurement spend by country
⚠ Concentration Risk
China at 68% vs peer avg 41% — 27pts above benchmark. Annual tariff excess vs peers: €380K. Vietnam allocation: 0% vs peer avg 22%.Revenue by Market vs Risk Score
Revenue share · compliance priority · EU+US = 79% of revenue
| Market | Priority | Rev % | Risk Score | Compliance Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU | P1 | 48% | 72 / 100 | €2.4M |
| US | P1 | 31% | 58 / 100 | €1.8M |
| UK | P2 | 12% | 45 / 100 | €0.6M |
| APAC | P2 | 9% | 81 / 100 | €0.3M |
EU+US = 79% of revenue — compliance investment priority
Country Risk Trinity
Wage inflation · FX delta · Geopolitical · Combined risk assessment
| Country | Wage Inflation | FX Delta | Geopolitical | Risk | Your Allocation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 China | +7.1% | +5.1% unfav | High | Critical | 68% |
| 🇧🇩 Bangladesh | +8.0% | +2.2% stbl | Low | Medium | 18% |
| 🇮🇳 India | +4.2% | −0.8% fav | Low | Low | 14% |
| 🇻🇳 Vietnam | +3.8% | −1.2% fav | Low | Low | 0% |
| 🇹🇷 Turkey | +18.4% | +1.8% stbl | Medium | Medium | 0% |
🔒 L&F Cross-Buyer Signal
2 Vietnam factories pre-qualified for your Bedding and Towel categories — no onboarding cost, comparable lead time (±3 days). Peers who shifted 15% in 2024 are realising savings. EU CBAM financial phase started Q2 2026 — China exposure at 68% generating €420K/yr tariff excess.
Facility Limit
€5.8M
4 enrolled suppliers
Utilized
€3.9M · 67%
▲ +5pts vs Q4
Available
€1.9M
Headroom remaining
Payments Due
€745K
Next 30 days · 4 countries
🏦 SCF & Financing
Supply chain finance facility · utilization · payment schedule
Utilization Trend — Q1 2025 to Q1 2026
Stacked: utilized (blue) + headroom (grey) · Line: utilization % · Caution at 80%
⚠ Headroom Watch
At current growth rate (+5pts/quarter), facility hits 80% caution threshold Q3 2026. Consider requesting limit increase now or restructuring utilization ahead of Q2 peak payments.Enrolled Suppliers
Active in SCF program · rates · utilized amounts
| Supplier | Country | Utilized | Rate | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu Xinhua | 🇨🇳 | €1.2M | 2.8% | Active |
| Dhaka Weave | 🇧🇩 | €0.8M | 3.1% | Active |
| Mumbai Fabrics | 🇮🇳 | €1.1M | 2.9% | Active |
| Hanoi Textiles | 🇻🇳 | €0.8M | 3.3% | Active |
| Total | €3.9M | 3.0% avg |
Payment Schedule — Next 30 Days
PO-based payment due dates by country
| Country | Suppliers | Amount | Due In | SCF Option |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 China | 3 | €420K | 18 days | Available |
| 🇧🇩 Bangladesh | 1 | €185K | 22 days | Available |
| 🇮🇳 India | 1 | €95K | 28 days | Available |
| 🇻🇳 Vietnam | 1 | €45K | 30 days | Available |
| Total | 6 POs | €745K |
💡 Enrolling China POs (€420K) in SCF can extend payment 30–60 days, freeing cashflow while maintaining supplier relationship.
Active POs
847
8 stalled >10 days
Total PO Value
€42M
Deployed this quarter
On-Time Delivery
94%
▲ vs 91% Q4
Stalled POs
8
>10 days no update
📦 Procurement
PO pipeline · channel mix · delivery performance
Procurement Channel Mix
% of spend by channel type · Q1 2026
Importer (52%): Highest compliance visibility, best audit trail.
Agent (31%): Faster but less traceability. Monitor closely for UFLPA compliance.
Consignment (17%): Higher risk — inventory held off-balance sheet. Flag for risk review.
Agent (31%): Faster but less traceability. Monitor closely for UFLPA compliance.
Consignment (17%): Higher risk — inventory held off-balance sheet. Flag for risk review.
PO Pipeline by Status
847 active POs across 9 suppliers
| Status | Count | Value | Avg Age | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmed | 412 | €18.2M | 8 days | — |
| In Production | 287 | €14.8M | 22 days | Track |
| Pending | 140 | €7.1M | 5 days | Chase |
| Stalled | 8 | €1.9M | 14 days | Urgent |
⚠ 8 Stalled POs — €1.9M at risk
3 from Jiangsu Xinhua (aligns with operational distress signal). Escalation required within 48h or Q3 delivery is compromised.Category Spend Breakdown
Q1 2026 procurement by category
| Category | PO Value | % of Total | OTD% | Cost Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bedding | €11.2M | 27% | 88% | +8.4% above mkt |
| Home Textile | €9.8M | 23% | 96% | Below mkt |
| Towels | €7.4M | 18% | 95% | Below mkt |
| Seasonal Deco | €8.1M | 19% | 92% | +3.8% above mkt |
| DIY Tools | €5.5M | 13% | 97% | Below mkt |
📡 Market Intelligence
Full feed · all signals
This section shows the full market and competitor intelligence feed. Use the filter buttons to focus on specific signal types.